Working…
Ternary-Complex Analysis

JARI-PROTACS

JARI — Joint Analysis for Reproducible Interface clustering — turns folders of PRosettaC-derived ternary-complex models into a reviewable similarity dataset, structural clusters, UMAP view, and hierarchical dendrogram.

It is the “what patterns survive across my model sets?” step after ternary modeling. JARI does not prove that a candidate degrades a protein; it makes pose-family comparison and reporting more reproducible.

PRosettaC model folders Pairwise DockQ DBSCAN + UMAP Reproducible figures
The workflow
  1. Start with PRosettaC model folders organized by ligand, linker, design, or pose family.
  2. Compare models within and across those folders with DockQ.
  3. Aggregate and average structural similarity scores.
  4. Cluster models using distance = 1 − Average_DockQ.
  5. Review clusters and figures alongside chemistry, biology, and experimental data.

Where JARI fits in PROTAC Builder

1 · Assemble

Use PROTAC Builder to define a candidate from a POI warhead, linker, and E3 recruiter, preserving attachment-vector context.

2 · Model

Generate ternary-complex hypotheses with PRosettaC or another appropriate structure-based workflow.

3 · Compare

Use JARI to quantify whether model families are structurally similar, distinct, or internally inconsistent.

4 · Decide

Use cluster membership as a prioritization signal, then validate promising designs experimentally.

Keep the boundary clear: JARI analyzes structural similarity among model outputs. It is not a degradation predictor and it cannot replace cellular degradation experiments.

What you get from a run

Stage 02

Cross-model DockQ scores

Pairwise comparisons across different ligand, linker, design, or pose families.

See the scoring stage ↗
Stage 03

Self-similarity scores

Within-family comparisons that reveal whether a model set is structurally coherent.

See the scoring stage ↗
Stage 07

Averaged score table

A compact input table for clustering where higher DockQ means closer structural similarity.

See output details ↗
Stages 11–12

Clusters and figures

DBSCAN assignments, a UMAP visualization, and a hierarchical dendrogram for transparent review.

See output details ↗

Three available structure-first starting points

These are saved Warhead Hunter handoff sets, not JARI clustering results. They demonstrate the upstream record you should preserve before building PROTACs and generating ternary-model ensembles for JARI.

Exposed-atom map for 2GJ6 · chain C · 3IB.
2GJ6 · chain C · 3IB
Keep this target-bound context with the later model family so comparisons remain traceable.
Exposed-atom map for 6HSK · chain A · GOK.
6HSK · chain A · GOK
Keep this target-bound context with the later model family so comparisons remain traceable.
Exposed-atom map for 4CI3 · chain B · Y70.
4CI3 · chain B · Y70
Keep this target-bound context with the later model family so comparisons remain traceable.

Ready to run it?

The walkthrough is intentionally copy-pasteable: set up Python, point JARI at a correctly organized model directory, run the numbered pipeline, and inspect the output files in order.